Giving an AI agent access to the live web sounds like one problem. It’s actually four, each with its own best-in-class providers, its own failure modes, and its own pricing model. This guide maps the whole landscape — what each capability is for, which API wins it (measured, not claimed), and why reaching them through one Auxiliar key beats collecting a drawer full of API keys.
The four web-access capabilities
1. Search — find relevant URLs and snippets for a query. This is how an agent grounds itself in current information for RAG and fact-checking. Winners differ by style: cheap raw Google (Serper), agent-native indexes (Tavily), neural/semantic search (Exa). See best search API for AI agents.
2. Scrape — turn one URL into clean, LLM-ready markdown. Quality varies wildly, and hard targets sit behind anti-bot systems. This is usually the highest-value and hardest step. See best web scraping API and best anti-bot scraping API.
3. Crawl — enumerate and fetch a whole site or section, not just one page. Needed for building a knowledge base from documentation or a catalog. See best web crawler API.
4. Extract — pull structured fields (a price, a spec table, a schema) out of a page. See best AI data extraction API.
Most real agents need two or three of these in one workflow — search to find, scrape to read, extract to structure.
Why not just pick one provider?
Because no provider wins every capability. In our benchmark, Firecrawl leads scraping and crawling, Scrapfly leads AI extraction accuracy, Serper leads SERP cost and speed, Exa leads cited answers, Oxylabs leads structured domain scraping. Standardize on any single vendor and you’re using their weakest verb somewhere.
The alternative is a gateway. One Auxiliar key reaches all of them at https://api.auxiliar.ai/<provider>/..., upstream keys injected server-side, billed to one balance. You route each job to the provider that actually wins it — and fall back to another when one gets blocked.
The minimal agent toolkit
Two tools cover most agents — search and read:
import os, requests
AUX = "https://api.auxiliar.ai"
H = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['AUXILIAR_API_KEY']}"}
def search(q):
return requests.post(f"{AUX}/serper/search", headers=H, json={"q": q}, timeout=30).json()
def read(url):
return requests.post(f"{AUX}/firecrawl/v1/scrape", headers=H,
json={"url": url, "formats": ["markdown"]}, timeout=60).json()
Framework-specific versions are one step away: LangChain, CrewAI, or a full research agent.
How to choose, in one sentence per job
| Job | What to optimize for | Where to look |
|---|---|---|
| Ground an agent in the web | recall + cost per useful result | best search API |
| Read a page as markdown | markdown cleanliness | best web scraping API |
| Get past Cloudflare/DataDome | measured bypass rate | best anti-bot API |
| Ingest a whole site | crawl coverage | best web crawler API |
| Pull structured fields | field accuracy | best extraction API |
| Cheapest Google results | cost per call | cheapest search API |
Every provider in those rankings is on one key — so the honest strategy isn’t “pick the best provider,” it’s “pick the best provider per job, and let a gateway make that a one-line choice.”